What is a wetting agent in photography
Content: You can find these tips here
What is image editing anyway?
This is how I develop my photos
In times of digital landscape photography, the topic is exciting image editing the minds. I am also asked again and again how much time I spend on the computer to conjure up such photos. Many look incredulous at my answer. I usually don't waste more than five minutes completely developing an image. But now I have to go back a little further. What is image editing anyway? Like any good photographer, I shoot my photos in raw format. The "raw data" are also referred to as "digital negative" because the image information is saved in its raw state. You surely know the various settings on the compact camera. Landscape, portrait, beach etc. - nothing else happens here than an internal development of your RAW file in the camera. Only that you can no longer influence the result. In addition, a lot of important image information in jpg format is lost forever.
Image processing in analog times
Just like in analog photography, a digital negative must also be developed before a “finished” photo is created. In the analogous period, a darkroom and developer, stop bath, fixer, wetting agent, demineralized water, a development box with a film coil and a thermometer were required. Not to forget that you can of course also influence the photo during analog development. It starts with the choice of film and ends in the darkroom. With pushing and pulling, for example, you can influence the contrast and grain of the photo. When you cross over, on the other hand, you develop your films in the wrong developer. The result: Your photos come in bright colors, are quite grainy and usually have a high contrast.
In analog photography, image processing also begins much earlier than in digital photography. With a yellow filter, yellow-green filter or a blue filter you can make certain colors lighter or darker in black and white pictures. In the digital age → gray filters, gray graduated filters and polarizing filters play a role. With these three filters you can achieve effects that no image editing program can imitate. There are even filters with which you can give an unbelievable blaze of color to an unspectacular sunset. Another example are haze filters, with which completely irrelevant picture elements simply disappear in a thick fog.
Image processing in the digital age
Nothing else than the development in the darkroom is the development with software on the computer today. The camera manufacturers supply their own software for developing the raw files. But you can also use programs like Adobe Lightroom, ACDSee Ultimate or Corel AfterShot Pro. I've been using Adobe Lightroom for years and I'm extremely satisfied. Of course, you can also pull the color controls in Lightroom as far as they will go - but hardly any photographer will do that. Compared to the results of cross-cuts in analog photography, Lightroom appears downright harmless - with the difference that today you can work much more precisely and see the result immediately. Developing with software like Lightroom is therefore not yet image processing for me, but the necessary development is an absolute must, comparable to analog film development.
This is how I develop my photos
Here I would like to show you some before and after examples. But I have to say that the original photo is always the jpg from the camera, i.e. it has already been developed in the camera - just not as I imagine it to be. It is also important to know that many jpg images give the impression that they are underexposed or overexposed. That is wanted. While many Jpg files actually have photographic defects in terms of exposure, there are undreamt-of possibilities in the raw format.
Nikon sensors, for example - many of which come from Sony - have incredible potential in the depths. In difficult lighting conditions, it makes perfect sense to intentionally underexpose the photo. The shadows are later brightened by software, while the bright areas of the image are ideally exposed. Almost black parts of the image can be brightened with almost no noise. With Canon, things are a little different: The strength of Canon sensors is more in the bright areas of the image. So here it is worthwhile to tend to over-expose a bit and to reduce the lights in development.
The subway in Zion National Park, Utah. Here I especially emphasized the beautiful orange tones
The in-camera “original” is less colorful
The ruined city of Aradena on Crete offers numerous photo opportunities. The morning was actually pretty dreary - until the sun came through the clouds for a moment
In the jpg from the camera, you can still see the gray graduated filter used, which darkens the upper part of the photo. With Lightroom, this shortcoming can be remedied in a few seconds
The coast near Vik in Iceland is incredibly beautiful - but also dangerous. Development took no more than five minutes. Straighten the horizon, change contrasts and saturation a little, pull up depths, sharpen and the work of art was ready
The image “Out of Cam”
Madeira sunset. The sky looked uninviting, but the ocean surf was just fantastic. The fact that the sky was then even a little red was of course awesome. Lightroom development was done in two minutes
The somewhat dark "original"
By the way, there is a photo tutorial here that we shot on the beach that evening
Personally, I always try to develop my photos very realistically, but that is of course a matter of taste. In the USA, for example, customers like gaudy photos, much more than we do. The photographers turn the controls accordingly. Even those who want to stand out on the Internet are well advised to keep the colors as bright as possible. A well-known photographer, who has been in the photo travel business for years and conjures up fantastic photos, recently said to me: “With this mass of photoshopped images on the Internet, my photos naturally get lost.” Unfortunately, that's the way it is - true quality can usually only be recognized when the developed photo hangs large on the wall. In times of flood of pictures on Instagram and Co - here, filtered cell phone pictures are often more applauded than real works of art - this is of course a problem.
Photoshop is essential in image editing
But I can't get by with Lightroom alone either. Photoshop is essential to my workflow. Aha, you might think now - but it's all fake. Well, my work has little to do with image processing as one or the other has in mind. I only use Photoshop to remove dust spots and other annoying smaller elements. Straightening the horizon and straightening plunging lines is also a thing for Photoshop. But is that image processing already? Opinions differ here. What I'm ultimately getting at: The line between necessary development in the digital darkroom and real image processing is fluid.
Antelope Canyon in Arizona. Is this already a classic image processing? This is definitely going in this direction, although the interventions are still manageable. In the classic way, the contrasts and saturation have been increased a bit. However, there was also a person in the picture. If you don't want the photo to end up in the digital trash can, you have to use Photoshop
In the original you can see a person in the background
But I still think that my photos should look as natural as possible and that everything has to be right when they are taken. Every minute at the computer is a lost minute that should be better spent outside in nature taking photos. That is also one of the reasons why I avoid the subject of High Dynamic Range Image (HDRI). In the end, the photo would rather not be 100 percent perfect than spend hours on the computer - although it is now only a matter of a few clicks to create an HDRI for simple subjects.
And anyway: does a photo always have to be perfect? Doesn't photography make a living from getting the best out of the situation with the means given to you? It's not for nothing that analog photography is experiencing a revival. I also always enjoy walking around with my analog Voigtlander Bessa L with a viewfinder and 15mm lens and reaping pitying looks when I fast-forward the film for the next photo. If only they knew - it is the ultimate deceleration in the flood of images.
With this post we take part in the blog parade called by Thomas → “How far can photo editing go?” part.
Your opinion is important to us
How far can image processing go in landscape photography? Is the development in Lightroom or another program still image processing digital art? Leave a short comment - we are looking forward to it?
⭐ Subscribe to the newsletter and download the photo e-book
We'll show you most beautiful places in the world, take you on exciting outdoor adventures and bring your Photo skills on a new level. In addition, you will never miss the latest photo course dates and ours again Competition for all subscribers.
Our thank youAs a thank you, we are giving you our photo e-book "This is how you can create the perfect landscape photo". Here you can register for the newsletter free of charge.
Even more adventures on Instagram, Facebook and Co.Follow our travel blog on Instagram, Facebook, Youtube and Pinterest.
- Roast a whole piglet
- How To Make Testosterone Suspension Homebrew
- What does wfe stand for
- Guy drinks a whole bottle of whiskey
- Przedszkole fantasazja bolechowice opinionie notariala
- Play school moderators where are they now
- Marit larsen when the morning comes zip
- How to get bios from ps2
- Trafico de mujeres pelicula completea descargar whatsapp
- How did Ben Sidey die
- What is the primary non-contributory endorsement
- How are larvae and pupae alike?
- Underworld empire how to get epic lieutenants
- 1810 stainless steel cookware costco wholesale
- What color is #fffffff
- How to merge bishamonten persona 3 fes
- When and where do the pilgrims gather
- Who votes away ubaba in spirited
- Who is James Stunt's father
- Eddie Howard, it's not a sin
- In medias res in beowulf who made
- How to play mjpeg files
- Thinstation, how to configure DNS
- Ghorakhal temple Bhowali weather